The efflorescence of menâs magazines in the UK lasted from about 1985 to 2010. You may recall their titles on newsagentsâ shelves â Arena, GQ, Maxim, Esquire â near in time but now as defunct as the clay tablets of Babylon. They are gone, mostly, along with those newsagentsâ shelves. It was a short-lived, almost parenthetical age. To revisit it in this new memoir by Dylan Jones, former editor of GQ, is to be transported to a world of scarcely imaginable glamour, of expense-account carelessness, of sybaritic indulgence unrivalled since the days of Rome. You can barely make it out through the rain of rose petals.
And squarely at the centre is Jones, scene-maker, master of the revels, and friend to the stars. Quite an irony today to read of his editorial perfectionism, and his insistence that every issue of his magazine should be an âart objectâ. This from the man who has just helped oversee the death warrant for the print edition of the 200-year-old London Evening Standard, having admitted to never reading a paper version of it himself. I wonder if it was not sufficiently âiconicâ for him.
His was not a happy upbringing. Beaten and sworn at daily by his brutish RAF veteran father, Jones developed a stammer and a longing to get away from the family home in High Wycombe. St Martinâs School of Art in London was his refuge, where a lifelong passion for design was born. After college he worked as a barman, a model, a DJ and a film extra before finding his métier in the inky environs of style journalism. As his teenage years had been guided by the lodestars of Bowie and the Beatles, in the 1980s he succumbed to the spell of fashion and London nightlife, or as Jones calls it, âa vortex of entrepreneurial hedonismâ swirling around the 100 Club, the Marquee, Soho Brasserie and the Groucho. Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, but to be on the club guest list was very heaven.
These Foolish Things makes for an interesting case study, though interesting in ways its author probably didnât intend. The parental abuse he deals with so briskly and unselfpityingly finds an outlet in a profound insecurity that imprints itself on every page. It becomes a precarious balancing act between self-concealment and a needy, low-level boastfulness. Because Jones isnât a great writer (he admits as much) he tends to grout the gaps in his account with lists of the great and good with whom he has hobnobbed. It is a narrative leprous with names â of bands, celebrities, writers, movers, shakers â and yet wholly unilluminating about any of them. He could be talking about brands of marmalade, or loo rolls. Even when he zooms in on one of his famous friends, such as Bowie or Bryan Ferry, we get no indication of a noticing eye or sympathetic mirroring. At times he seems faintly inhuman. âI wasnât overburdened with empathy,â he writes, remembering how as a child he received news of human-loss catastrophes quite equably. Why? âBecause there would be fewer people in the world.â Smiley-face emojis all round!
In the meantime the years roll on and Jones hops from magazines to newspapers and back, vaunting his latest pay rise, freebie holiday or celebrity catch. He calls these VIPs âboldface namesâ, and while he doesnât seem to like many of them he arranges their private jets and financial sweeteners without demur. Name-dropping, a pathology for him, neednât be fatal in itself. In this kind of memoir it doesnât necessarily matter if the prose doesnât shine so long as you convey a sense of energy, or fun, or charm (this last the most elusive of the three). Iâm thinking here of Robert Evansâs The Kid Stays in the Picture, which positively ached with self-aggrandisement and yet jollied the reader along with its chutzpah and its delight in the folly of the world. Jones already has his work cut out for him in dallying with people â Piers Morgan, Philip Green, David Cameron (with whom he wrote a book) â that very few writers could humanise, and even the famous people youâd quite like to know about end up flattened by his affectlessness. And worse. He doesnât seem to hear himself when he illustrates how âextraordinarily funnyâ Elton John can be with a version of a remark of such repulsive misogyny in my view that Iâm surprised his editor (if he had one) didnât advise him to cut it
Towards the end the book springs a shock revelation, which may partially explain why Jones ended up the way he did. It happened when he was 17, still in High Wycombe, and someone he âsort of knewâ drove him back to his flat and got him drunk. He woke some hours later to find himself being raped. He describes feelings of self-hatred and disgust that followed in the wake of the assault, and how he then opted to do something perfectly comprehensible â namely, bury it. The trauma of what happened crashed in on him years later when he did therapy. The reader may find himself in hindsight recalibrating his view of the authorâs arrogant dismissiveness, his absence of charm, his tin ear for the vile joke or tasteless remark. Humanityâs crooked timber and all that. Tout comprendre, câest tout pardonner. Whether you can pardon him this book is another matter.